Before the premiere of the film The Hobbit: Smaug Desolation , Fran Walsh stated that the second part of the Hobbit trilogy is the best action movie he shot Jackson . And I was wrong . In contrast to the unexpected Journey , in the wasteland Smaug does not have the classic incorporation of shares ( and it is not surprising , in the end we have to deal with the middle film ) . Once set at the end of the events of the first film machine spins faster and faster : Visit Beorn , dark forest , Forest kingdom Esgaroth , Erebor , and finally is what many have been waiting since PJ decided to shoot The Hobbit - Smaug . However, it is so that the viewer can not find respite . Killing the pace he set Peter Jackson , sometimes subtly slows to watching the movie could afford all somehow sort out in my imagination . So is the second part of The Hobbit is a film without flaws ? Not really. Wilderness as a central part of Smaug falls well. He has a lot of elements of an adventure film . The director kept the skeleton of the story, but some of the muscles and tendons are no longer his own work . It combines them in a more or less neat way . You need to look at the second part of the trilogy in two ways. As filming deserves note 6.5/10 . As the movie 9.5/10 .
Opisz swój ulubiony film po angielsku. Mój ulubiony film to hobbit. Ale te słówka co są w 4 klasie ok?
Odpowiedź
Dodaj swoją odpowiedź